<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New MapGuide Sample Apps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jasonbirch.com/nodes/2006/12/05/54/new-mapguide-sample-apps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jasonbirch.com/nodes/2006/12/05/54/new-mapguide-sample-apps/</link>
	<description>...Jason Birch's geospatial ramblings</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 20:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jason Birch</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonbirch.com/nodes/2006/12/05/54/new-mapguide-sample-apps/#comment-4154</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Birch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 03:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonbirch.com/nodes/2006/12/05/54/new-mapguide-sample-apps/#comment-4154</guid>
		<description>Are you running Enterprise SP1?  There are considerable speed improvements when accessing Oracle data.

It's hard to compare Enterprise against 6.5; they are completely different architectures with different viewing technology.  I haven't had a chance to run both on the same hardware with the same layers yet, so can't comment one way or another.  

I wouldn't be surprised if Enterprise was slower.  It's still new technology, and it also has considerably more functionality than 6.5 did, which probably means that there is more overhead.

Jason</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you running Enterprise SP1?  There are considerable speed improvements when accessing Oracle data.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s hard to compare Enterprise against 6.5; they are completely different architectures with different viewing technology.  I haven&#8217;t had a chance to run both on the same hardware with the same layers yet, so can&#8217;t comment one way or another.  </p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if Enterprise was slower.  It&#8217;s still new technology, and it also has considerably more functionality than 6.5 did, which probably means that there is more overhead.</p>
<p>Jason</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fábio Gomes</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonbirch.com/nodes/2006/12/05/54/new-mapguide-sample-apps/#comment-4152</link>
		<dc:creator>Fábio Gomes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 01:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonbirch.com/nodes/2006/12/05/54/new-mapguide-sample-apps/#comment-4152</guid>
		<description>Hi,Jason.  I'm GIS developer and I've worked at a Brazilian Autodesk Reseller and Consultant.  I've developed gis systems since 3 years ago using Autodesk Map Guide 6.5 and Oracle spatial and Now I'm judging the MapGuide Enterprise. I'm find it much more slow than mapguide 6.5. I noticed this in that samples again.  Do you agree with me ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,Jason.  I&#8217;m GIS developer and I&#8217;ve worked at a Brazilian Autodesk Reseller and Consultant.  I&#8217;ve developed gis systems since 3 years ago using Autodesk Map Guide 6.5 and Oracle spatial and Now I&#8217;m judging the MapGuide Enterprise. I&#8217;m find it much more slow than mapguide 6.5. I noticed this in that samples again.  Do you agree with me ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slashgeo</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonbirch.com/nodes/2006/12/05/54/new-mapguide-sample-apps/#comment-1157</link>
		<dc:creator>Slashgeo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 22:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonbirch.com/nodes/2006/12/05/54/new-mapguide-sample-apps/#comment-1157</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;MapGuide Open Source Benefits and Demos...&lt;/strong&gt;

Random Nodes shares his view on the benefits of MapGuide Open Source. In another entry, he is delighted by many online MapGuide OS demos and sample applications. From this entry: "A new website has been added to the MapGuide Open Source Live Gallery ,...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>MapGuide Open Source Benefits and Demos&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Random Nodes shares his view on the benefits of MapGuide Open Source. In another entry, he is delighted by many online MapGuide OS demos and sample applications. From this entry: &#8220;A new website has been added to the MapGuide Open Source Live Gallery ,&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hablandodesigs &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ejemplos en vivo de MapGuide Open Source</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonbirch.com/nodes/2006/12/05/54/new-mapguide-sample-apps/#comment-1110</link>
		<dc:creator>hablandodesigs &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ejemplos en vivo de MapGuide Open Source</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 07:17:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonbirch.com/nodes/2006/12/05/54/new-mapguide-sample-apps/#comment-1110</guid>
		<description>[...] platicado en import cartography, James Fee y en Random Nodes (uff, las noticias vuelan). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] platicado en import cartography, James Fee y en Random Nodes (uff, las noticias vuelan). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
