<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Value proposition for open source geospatial</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jasonbirch.com/nodes/2007/09/21/130/value-proposition-for-open-source-geospatial/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jasonbirch.com/nodes/2007/09/21/130/value-proposition-for-open-source-geospatial/</link>
	<description>...Jason Birch's geospatial ramblings</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 14:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sean Gillies</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonbirch.com/nodes/2007/09/21/130/value-proposition-for-open-source-geospatial/#comment-49445</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Gillies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2007 20:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonbirch.com/nodes/2007/09/21/130/value-proposition-for-open-source-geospatial/#comment-49445</guid>
		<description>In a way, GDAL and FME are sorta like Ruby on Rails and Basecamp: the open source framework and the derived commercial application. Except that Safe is still in the 20th century business model of selling software, and so they've got to keep a huge amount of it proprietary. 37signals, on the other hand, is selling *services* and benefits from open sourcing much more of their software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a way, GDAL and FME are sorta like Ruby on Rails and Basecamp: the open source framework and the derived commercial application. Except that Safe is still in the 20th century business model of selling software, and so they&#8217;ve got to keep a huge amount of it proprietary. 37signals, on the other hand, is selling *services* and benefits from open sourcing much more of their software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
