<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Python FDO Spotted in the Wild</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jasonbirch.com/nodes/2008/12/03/243/python-fdo-spotted-in-the-wild/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jasonbirch.com/nodes/2008/12/03/243/python-fdo-spotted-in-the-wild/</link>
	<description>...Jason Birch's geospatial ramblings</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 11:23:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: rbranson</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonbirch.com/nodes/2008/12/03/243/python-fdo-spotted-in-the-wild/comment-page-1/#comment-67005</link>
		<dc:creator>rbranson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 19:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonbirch.com/nodes/?p=243#comment-67005</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure it would have helped if I was actually a Python developer :) It does get the job done though, and, much agreed that it&#039;s a much more rapid approach than C++, especially for something that doesn&#039;t require the same level of &quot;bulletproofness.&quot; I am implementing some stuff on the MapGuide API using JRuby (Ruby on Java VM), which has turned out to be decent with some help from a few wrapper classes. Ultimately I would like to have the time to dust off the old C++ chops and put together an FDO SWIG port for Ruby. The only problems I&#039;ve had so far with Python/SWIG/FDO out of the box is that there&#039;s no reasonable way to access the IoStream classes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure it would have helped if I was actually a Python developer :) It does get the job done though, and, much agreed that it&#8217;s a much more rapid approach than C++, especially for something that doesn&#8217;t require the same level of &#8220;bulletproofness.&#8221; I am implementing some stuff on the MapGuide API using JRuby (Ruby on Java VM), which has turned out to be decent with some help from a few wrapper classes. Ultimately I would like to have the time to dust off the old C++ chops and put together an FDO SWIG port for Ruby. The only problems I&#8217;ve had so far with Python/SWIG/FDO out of the box is that there&#8217;s no reasonable way to access the IoStream classes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

